Jeffrey Epstein was many issues: a sexual predator, a buddy to the wealthy and highly effective and, for a few years, a profitable buyer of the nation’s largest financial institution.

Now the financial institution, JPMorgan Chase, faces a reckoning for its practically 15-year relationship with the disgraced financier, one that would value it an enormous payout in two civil lawsuits that declare the financial institution ignored warnings that he was trafficking teenage ladies for intercourse as a result of it was cashing in on its relationship with him.

New disclosures ensuing from the circumstances counsel that workers of the financial institution flagged Mr. Epstein’s exercise as suspicious on various events, whereas different paperwork present Mr. Epstein’s familiarity with high executives on the financial institution, and his easy accessibility to them, even after his 2008 responsible plea in Florida to soliciting prostitution from a teenage woman.

Filed late final 12 months in federal courtroom in Manhattan, the lawsuits — one introduced by attorneys representing Mr. Epstein’s victims and the opposite by the federal government of the U.S. Virgin Islands — are continuing on a quick monitor, with dozens of depositions taken of victims, Virgin Islands officers and individuals who labored for the financial institution and Mr. Epstein.

The proceedings will tackle a brand new urgency on Friday, when Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan’s chief govt, is scheduled to be deposed on the financial institution’s headquarters in Manhattan.

Mr. Epstein died by suicide three years in the past whereas being held in federal custody on sex-trafficking fees. JPMorgan dropped him as a consumer a decade in the past. Most of the paperwork and reveals filed within the litigation are beneath seal.

One doc ready by the financial institution, an exhibit in a courtroom submitting final week, suggests workers of JPMorgan filed quite a few suspicious exercise reviews, or SARs, about a few of Mr. Epstein’s transactions. The names of some 4 dozen workers who the financial institution stated have been “concerned in reporting SARs referring to Epstein Accounts between 2000 and 2019” are redacted.

Banks should file a SAR with federal regulators after they suspect {that a} transaction might contain cash laundering or fraud. The reviews are stored confidential as a result of the transactions may show to be reputable, although they’ll present investigative results in the authorities.

A JPMorgan spokeswoman stated the financial institution had not recognized of something that indicated Mr. Epstein was concerned in intercourse trafficking. In filings associated to the case, the financial institution has additionally disclosed that it requested federal prosecutors in Florida in 2011 if there was any lively investigation of Mr. Epstein. The financial institution stated the prosecutors had not disclosed any investigation.

A separate cache of emails and partial calendar entries reviewed by The New York Occasions exhibits that high executives on the financial institution had a stage of familiarity with Mr. Epstein.

“Nonetheless ready in your name,” Mr. Epstein wrote in October 2011 to Mary C. Erdoes, the present head of the financial institution’s huge asset and wealth administration division.

Ms. Erdoes replied: “Critically. It’s 1 a.m. your time. I’d say get a life … however you’re on the Ritz and we aren’t.” Ms. Erdoes added that she had simply landed in California and would speak to Mr. Epstein the subsequent day.

The emails, and calender entries for Mr. Epstein whereas he was staying at his Manhattan mansion, have been obtained by way of a public data request to the lawyer common for the U.S. Virgin Islands. JPMorgan’s spokeswoman has stated contact between rich shoppers and financial institution executives is just not unusual.

The emails offered to The Occasions by the Virgin Islands additionally embody exchanges between Mr. Epstein and James E. Staley, the JPMorgan govt with the closest ties to him.

Just a few are of a private nature: In a single dialog from 2015, Mr. Staley requested Mr. Epstein if he would meet along with his daughter to debate her post-college plans. In a 2011 e-mail alternate, there was a dialogue about arranging a dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Staley’s household.

Different emails between Mr. Epstein, Ms. Erdoes and Mr. Staley concerned potential enterprise offers. A collection of exchanges targeted on Mr. Epstein’s effort to determine a charitable partnership between the financial institution, the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis and others. He additionally inquired about assembly with Mr. Dimon to debate the plan.

The financial institution’s spokeswoman stated Mr. Epstein had by no means met with Mr. Dimon. Mr. Epstein’s proposed charitable fund with the Gates Basis and JPMorgan by no means superior a lot past the speaking stage in 2011 when Mr. Gates first met Mr. Epstein.

JPMorgan reduce ties with Mr. Epstein in 2013, although that was years after some members of the financial institution’s compliance division had raised alarms about doing enterprise with him. And it dropped him solely after Mr. Staley had left for one more job.

Mr. Staley and Ms. Erdoes, The Occasions beforehand reported, favored maintaining Mr. Epstein as a consumer after his 2008 responsible plea, partially as a result of he helped carry rich shoppers to JPMorgan’s private-banking division.

The connection between Mr. Epstein and Mr. Staley, who is called Jes, is a central query within the litigation. Legal professionals for the Virgin Islands have claimed that the 2 males shared sexually suggestive emails about younger girls and that typically Mr. Epstein despatched Mr. Staley “photographs of younger girls in seductive poses.”

The Virgin Islands has stated the financial institution ought to have been conscious of the emails. Mr. Staley left JPMorgan in 2013 and in 2015 turned the chief govt of Barclays. He resigned that place in 2021 due to the fallout from an investigation by British regulators into how he had characterised his relationship with Mr. Epstein.

JPMorgan has stated it was not conscious of any inappropriate conduct involving Mr. Staley. However the financial institution has named him as a defendant in a third-party lawsuit, in order that whether it is decided that Mr. Staley engaged in improper exercise, he could be held chargeable for any damages it could need to pay. A federal choose this week rejected Mr. Staley’s try to be dismissed from the litigation.

Neither Mr. Staley nor his attorneys responded to requests for remark, however in courtroom papers, he has denied any wrongdoing and has stated he was unaware of any intercourse trafficking operation.

The attorneys for Mr. Epstein’s victims scored an enormous win in the same case final week, when Deutsche Financial institution, which succeeded JPMorgan as Mr. Epstein’s major banker, agreed to pay $75 million to settle a proposed class-action swimsuit filed in federal courtroom final 12 months. The German financial institution beforehand paid a $150 million penalty to New York regulators.

The proposed settlement with Deutsche Financial institution may turn out to be a template for any take care of JP Morgan. JPMorgan had managed 40 accounts for Mr. Epstein and dealt with most of his wire transfers, which included funds to girls believed to be victims, folks briefed on the matter stated.

“JPM was his true companion,” stated Bradley Edwards, who, together with David Boies, is a part of the authorized group representing the victims of Mr. Epstein within the lawsuit. “There isn’t any actual comparability between the 2 circumstances.”

Thus far, Mr. Epstein’s property — as soon as valued at $600 million — has paid out over $150 million in settlements to greater than 125 victims. These victims could possibly be eligible to get among the cash from the proposed take care of Deutsche Financial institution.

The Virgin Islands lawsuit in opposition to JPMorgan arose from data the territory had gathered throughout litigation with Mr. Epstein’s property. The Virgin Islands had sued to recoup tens of tens of millions in tax advantages it had awarded to Mr. Epstein’s companies that have been based mostly in St. Thomas, reaching a $105 million settlement in November.

The Virgin Islands’ personal dealings with Mr. Epstein even have raised controversy through the years. Not solely did it award profitable tax breaks to his companies however in 2012, the federal government eased journey restrictions for Mr. Epstein after a request from his attorneys, in line with paperwork that The Occasions obtained by way of a public data request.

Due to his standing as a intercourse offender, Mr. Epstein was required to inform authorities of any journey plans, however that advance discover was reduce to at some point from roughly three weeks by the Virgin Islands’ lawyer common on the time, the paperwork present.

JPMorgan has seized on a few of these criticisms of the Virgin Islands authorities to argue the territory is in no place to sue for damages. The financial institution, in a courtroom submitting on Tuesday, stated officers within the U.S. territory had an extended historical past of cozying as much as Mr. Epstein and regarded “the opposite method when he walked by way of U.S.V.I. airports accompanied by ladies and younger girls.”

The financial institution additionally famous Mr. Epstein made frequent marketing campaign donations to native politicians, and it has sought details about Cecile de Jongh, the spouse of a former governor of the Virgin Islands, who was a longtime workplace supervisor for Mr. Epstein’s firms. It’s also set to depose Albert Bryan Jr., the present governor, who was the chairman of the company that awarded Mr. Epstein’s companies the massive tax breaks.