A Republican-led committee of the Texas Home of Representatives advisable on Thursday that the state’s legal professional common, Ken Paxton, be impeached for a spread of abuses of his workplace that the committee’s investigators mentioned could have been crimes.

The advice thrust the State Capitol and its Republican management into uncharted political territory within the waning days of the legislative session, setting the stage for the Home to carry a vote on impeachment, its first in many years and one of many few ever performed within the state’s historical past.

If he’s impeached, Mr. Paxton, who has been underneath a separate prison indictment since 2015, could be required to step down from his put up quickly whereas he faces trial within the State Senate.

“There’s actually no precedent — we’ve actually solely had two impeachments underneath the Structure of 1876,” mentioned Mark P. Jones, a professor of political science at Rice College. They embrace the governor in 1917, who resigned the day earlier than the Senate convicted him, and a district choose who was convicted and eliminated within the Seventies.

Earlier than the vote, the committee met in an government session, exterior public view.

“Overturning elections begins behind closed doorways,” Mr. Paxton mentioned in a put up on Twitter that included video of a lawyer from his workplace arguing towards impeachment to reporters in a virtually empty committee room, whereas the committee’s deliberations had been underway.

After the vote, the committee filed 20 articles of impeachment towards Mr. Paxton, charging him with a litany of abuses together with taking bribes, disregarding his official obligation, obstructing justice in a separate securities fraud case pending towards him, making false statements on official paperwork and stories, and abusing the general public belief.

Lots of the expenses associated to the assorted ways in which Mr. Paxton had used his workplace to profit a specific donor, the committee mentioned, after which fireplace these within the workplace who spoke up towards his actions.

Because the articles had been being handed out across the Home chamber late Thursday, Andrew Murr, the chairman of the committee, a Republican, mentioned that they described “grave offenses” and that he supposed to convey them up for a vote by the Home.

The extraordinary developments had been prone to take a look at the Republican Celebration in Texas in new and unpredictable methods, at a time when divisions within the occasion have more and more been uncovered.

The Texas Home is led by Speaker Dade Phelan, a Republican representing Beaumont who’s seen as a conventional conservative. In distinction, Mr. Paxton has been allied with probably the most strident Republican legislators in Texas and with former President Donald J. Trump, in a camp that additionally consists of the lieutenant governor and chief of the State Senate, Dan Patrick.

The Home investigations committee, made up of three Republicans and two Democrats, voted unanimously to go ahead with impeachment proceedings throughout a short public session. “The chair strikes that the committee undertake the articles of impeachment towards Warren Kenneth Paxton, legal professional common of the state of Texas,” Mr. Murr mentioned.

It was not instantly clear when the Home would take up the articles of impeachment and conduct a flooring vote, although a number of members mentioned they anticipated it might happen earlier than the session ended on Monday. If not, lawmakers may name themselves again right into a particular session at any level to deliberate.

Requested by a Home member concerning the timing of an impeachment vote, Mr. Phelan mentioned on Thursday night time that Mr. Murr would decide when to convey up the matter for a vote. He didn’t present a timetable.

For a lot of Thursday, Home members had been making ready for what had already began to really feel inevitable.

At the least one lawmaker may very well be discovered researching the impeachment course of within the Capitol’s library. “I’m making an attempt to determine what impeachment is all about,” mentioned the lawmaker, Consultant John Smithee, a Republican from the conservative Texas Panhandle. Talking earlier than the committee’s vote, he mentioned that it was too early to solid judgment on the matter and that he believed officers is perhaps dashing into impeachment.

“I want to hear further proof as a substitute of only a report,” Mr. Smithee mentioned, “and his facet of the story if he’s prepared to inform it.”

The vote by the Home committee got here a day after hours of detailed testimony on Wednesday from a crew of investigators — former prosecutors who had been employed by the committee to look into corruption allegations towards Mr. Paxton.

The investigators described how Mr. Paxton had abused and misused his workplace to assist an Austin actual property developer and donor who additionally employed a girl with whom Mr. Paxton was having a relationship, and the way Mr. Paxton had created a local weather of concern throughout the workplace of the legal professional common.

The misdeeds that Mr. Paxton was accused of committing rose to the extent of doable criminality, the investigators mentioned, together with cases of retaliation towards individuals who spoke up.

The committee didn’t take testimony throughout its session on Thursday.

The lawyer from Mr. Paxton’s workplace, Christopher Hilton, instructed reporters that the committee’s course of had been “utterly missing” and referred to as the testimony from Wednesday “false” and “deceptive.” He added that the problems raised by the committee had been absolutely aired throughout Mr. Paxton’s re-election marketing campaign final yr, when he was elected to a 3rd time period.

“The 2022 election, the first and the overall was run on these points, these allegations,” Mr. Hilton mentioned. “The voters have spoken. They need Ken Paxton as their legal professional common.”

And, in what seemed to be a preview of a doable authorized problem to the proceedings, Mr. Hilton mentioned that Texas regulation allowed impeachment just for conduct because the previous election.

Consultant Trey Martinez Fischer, the chair of the Democratic caucus within the Texas Home, mentioned after the vote that impeachments had been “very uncommon and really critical,” including, “I belief that the committee has put loads of work into it, and I’ll consider the proof and see the place this course of takes us.”

One other Democrat, Consultant Jon Rosenthal of Houston, mentioned that the fees towards Mr. Paxton had been “fairly dangerous” and that he would very doubtless vote for impeachment. “I problem you to discover a Democrat who’ll say, ‘No, I received’t vote for impeachment,’” he mentioned.

The investigation started in March, after Mr. Paxton, who can also be underneath indictment for securities fraud, had apparently succeeded in placing at the very least certainly one of his authorized troubles behind him. He had agreed to a $3.3 million settlement with 4 of his prime aides who had sued him, accusing him of corruption and retaliation.

Mr. Paxton had requested the Texas Legislature for the funds to pay the settlement. However Mr. Phelan, the Home speaker, didn’t help that use of state cash, and mentioned he felt that Mr. Paxton had not sufficiently defined why the state ought to finance the settlement. The Home investigation into the allegations was begun with a view to collect details about the funding request, Mr. Phelan’s spokeswoman mentioned.

For 2 days this week, because the committee’s investigation neared its conclusion, Mr. Paxton hurled accusations towards Mr. Phelan, and claimed that the speaker presided over a Home session final week whereas drunk. Mr. Paxton primarily based his accusation on a video that circulated amongst hard-right activists who blame Mr. Phelan for the failure of varied items of conservative laws within the Home.

A lot of what was introduced to the committee about Mr. Paxton was already identified publicly from the allegations made within the aides’ lawsuit. The aides additionally took their complaints about Mr. Paxton to the F.B.I., which remains to be investigating.

The vote on Thursday rendered the primary official judgment on these allegations, discovering them ample to start the method of eradicating Mr. Paxton from workplace.

The committee additionally voted to concern letters to the Texas Division of Public Security and the Texas Services Fee, which manages state property, “to make sure that all proof related to the committee’s inquiry” wouldn’t be “destroyed or hid,” mentioned Mr. Murr, the committee chairman.

The impeachment vote was the second time this yr that the committee had advisable the removing of an elected official from workplace. The primary concerned a Republican state consultant, Bryan Slaton; a committee investigation discovered that he had slept with a 19-year-old workers member after serving her alcohol.

Mr. Slaton resigned shortly after. The Home then voted unanimously to formally expel him, and forestall him from holding workplace sooner or later.

David Montgomery contributed reporting.