“A whole bunch of individuals on our terrorist watch listing are crossing our borders.”

— Sen. Tim Scott (RS.C.) in his presidential speechtwenty second of Could

In a speech formally asserting that he’s operating for the Republican Celebration for President, Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina made the announcement as a part of an assault on President Biden’s immigration insurance policies. That is an attention-grabbing instance of how politicians can distort the information and create a deceptive impression.

Simply earlier than he referred to “a whole bunch of individuals” on the listing of terrorists crossing the borders, Scott started the sentence with this introduction: “On my first day as commander-in-chief, probably the most highly effective nation on Earth will cease retreating from our personal southern border. When you do not management your again door, this isn’t your property. And if our southern border is unreliable and unreliable, it isn’t our nation.”

As a listener, you’d most likely suppose he meant that a whole bunch of terrorist-connected individuals are crossing the US-Mexico border. You’ll be unsuitable.

Observe that Scott used the phrase “borders”. Scott’s spokesman mentioned he was referring to Division of Homeland Safety knowledge referring to “terrorist screening encounters,” particularly the class that features a particular person of any nationality exhibiting up at any land-based entry level. Because of this somebody tried to enter america by way of an official entry level, similar to a bridge, and was discovered on the terrorist screening database, generally often called the “watch listing.”

There is no such thing as a exact estimate of the variety of names on the listing, however it’s believed to be over 1 million. The American Civil Liberties Union, extrapolating from the newest official figures, estimated final 12 months that greater than 1.6 million individuals have been on the listing, together with some US residents. Issues have lengthy been raised that individuals are misplaced on it, generally due to related names, and that eradicating oneself from the listing is tough.

In any case, the info reveals that a lot of the encounters occurred on the border with Canada, not with Mexico. For instance, in FY 2022, there have been 313 watchlist encounters that have been stopped on the northern border, in comparison with 67 on the southern border. Up to now this fiscal 12 months, which started in October. 1, there have been 49 collisions on the US-Mexico border and 246 on the Canadian border. (Observe: The Division of Homeland Safety says the info could embrace a number of encounters with the identical particular person.)

In recent times, probably the most clashes at each borders occurred when Donald Trump was president in 2019, suggesting this isn’t only a Biden administration subject.

There’s a separate class specified by DHS – encounters with non-U.S. residents between ports of entry. Because of this individuals are attempting to get by way of the border – for instance, by way of a sparsely populated desert – as an alternative of utilizing the official checkpoint. This often happens alongside the southern border, and within the final two years the quantity has jumped from 15 in FY2021 to 98 in FY2022 and 96 this 12 months. Encounters with individuals on the watchlist accounted for 0.0079% of whole unreported border encounters in fiscal 12 months 2023, in accordance with DHS knowledge.

This brings us to the second a part of Scott’s assertion – that these individuals “cross our borders.” That is unsuitable. The individuals listed within the knowledge given by Scott’s spokesman have been stopped on the border; they didn’t overlap. As for the individuals who tried to sneak in, they may have entered the nation for a short while, however they have been caught.

Stephen W. Yale-Lauer, a professor of immigration legislation at Cornell Regulation College, mentioned the usage of the phrase “crossing our borders” was an overstatement. “They have been caught on the border both on the port of entry or between ports of entry,” he mentioned. So maybe “caught attempting to cross the border” can be extra correct.

Denise L. Gilman, co-director of the Immigration Clinic on the College of Texas Regulation College, famous in an e-mail that encounters with individuals on the watch listing aren’t frequent, and “numbers are negligible within the scheme of numbers of cross-border arrivals in america.”

Each Gilman and Yale-Lor famous that not everybody on the watch listing is a terrorist. “It has been documented that many individuals are erroneously positioned on watch lists and that there are different severe issues related to these lists, so assembly an individual on the listing does not likely imply assembly a terrorist,” Gilman mentioned.

Scott’s assertion “is a part of a pattern that implies there are safety dangers or crises on the border the place there may be merely no proof that the arrival of asylum seekers on the border poses any form of safety danger,” she added.

Scott’s line, though technically correct, lacks necessary context. This occurs within the part of his speech the place he talks in regards to the southern border, however the federal knowledge he refers to reveals that extra encounters are happening on the northern border. He says individuals on the terrorist listing have been crossing borders after they have been really being stopped. It is also doable that somebody was mistakenly positioned on a watchlist.

Scott earns Two Pinocchios.

Ship us the information for verification by filling out this kind

Join a truth verify weekly publication

Reality checker is a verify signed the set of ideas of the Worldwide Reality-Checking Community